Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Blog Article
77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In accordance with the EPA charge schedule, the request should be limited in scope, and not be intended for redistribution around the internet or for commercial purposes.
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not use, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, instead he is acquitted of the criminal charges based on evidence and it really is perfectly-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted in the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment with the department and held him disqualified for your post because acquittal for all upcoming purposes. The aforesaid proposition has actually been set at naught via the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case of your District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Because of their position between The 2 main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of law.
Reasonable grounds are available over the record to connect the petitioner with the commission from the alleged offence. However punishment with the alleged offence does not drop in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. however acquired Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is within the credit in the petitioner as accused, therefore, case from the petitioner falls inside the exception where bail cannot be granted even inside the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, assistance is sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran get more info versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of the same is hereby reproduced:
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a possibility of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, together with eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature with the seized currency.
I) The above referred case FIR, to the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered on the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that is father of the petitioner and According to Tale of FIR, the petitioner can be an eyewkness of the incidence.
In some jurisdictions, case regulation is usually applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
This article delves into the intricacies with the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case law, to offer a comprehensive understanding of its implications and realistic applications.
In case the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished If your employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were nicely conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
competent authority has determined the eligibility with the private respondents and found them to become healthy for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)